Skip banner Home   Sources   How Do I?   Site Map   What's New   Help  
Search Terms: fuel , economy, standards
  FOCUS™    
Edit Search
Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed   Previous Document Document 122 of 803. Next Document

Copyright 2002 Gannett Company, Inc.  
USA TODAY

July 26, 2002, Friday, FINAL EDITION

SECTION: NEWS; Pg. 11A

LENGTH: 392 words

HEADLINE: Little benefit at a big price

BYLINE: Josephine Cooper

BODY:
Today's debate: Global warming


Opposing view: Driver's beloved SUVs, minivans face price hikes because of this law.

A new law that would give the unelected bureaucrats in California the power to design the cars you drive may sound like a cliched Hollywood script. But now the governor has signed legislation to do just that.


The California law would give the state Air Resources Board unprecedented authority to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) from motor vehicles. Since the only way to produce less CO2 is to combust less fuel, this measure is really a back-door attempt to subvert federal fuel-economy standards.


Some contend that controlling CO2 emissions is of vital importance to the planet. If so, it must be controlled at the federal level or, better yet, the global level. California going it alone won't solve any problems, though it will force Californians to pay dearly for their state's political symbolism.


Under this legislation, Californians will likely face hikes in the costs of owning and driving vehicles -- particularly minivans, pickups and SUVs -- even though the new law would provide no benefit to California or any other state. Because California's motor vehicles account for a tiny fraction of global CO2, this legislation will be all pocketbook pain and no environmental gain.


Automakers offer more than 50 vehicles that get better than 30 miles per gallon, yet those account for a fraction of sales. Indeed, the 10 cars with the highest mpg represent less than 2% of vehicle sales.


Nearly 50% of California new vehicle sales are SUVs, vans, minivans and pickup trucks because consumers want more cargo space, passenger room, safety features, hauling capacity, and towing and off-road capabilities.


And don't think that you shouldn't be concerned because you live elsewhere. Proponents of this legislation want other states to adopt it. They want bureaucrats in other states to decide what kind of vehicle you can drive. That's un-American.


There is a better way. Automakers are investing billions of dollars to bring fuel cell and hybrid electric vehicles to the marketplace. Let's give Americans tax incentives to buy them, rather than try to force them out of the cars they love.


Josephine Cooper is president and CEO of the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers.


LOAD-DATE: July 26, 2002




Previous Document Document 122 of 803. Next Document
Terms & Conditions   Privacy   Copyright © 2004 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.