WASHINGTON, Jul. 11,
2001—Federal fuel-economy standards for motor vehicles
should be “consigned to the junkyard of failed federal
policy,” says a new paper from The Heritage Foundation.
The Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE)
program, created by Congress in 1975 as a response to the Arab
oil embargo, was designed to conserve gasoline and cut U.S.
dependence on oil imports. It has failed on both counts, says
Charli Coon, Heritage’s senior policy analyst for energy and
environment. Worse, she says, the program exposes American
motorists to a greater risk of death and injury.
Though CAFE standards (currently 27.5
miles per gallon for passenger cars and 20.7 mpg for light
trucks) have improved average fuel efficiency by nearly 50
percent, they haven’t cut gas consumption, Coon writes. That’s
because, during that same period, people doubled their
average number of miles driven—off-setting the gains made in
efficiency.
As for lessening America’s dependence on
foreign oil, Coon notes, the numbers speak for themselves. At
the onset of the 1973 oil embargo, America imported 35 percent
of its oil. Today, 52 percent comes from foreign suppliers, a
situation that two congressional panels have declared a
national security risk.
Meanwhile, Coon notes, vehicle
manufacturers have replaced the sturdy steel construction
techniques of the pre-CAFE era with lightweight material that
makes it possible to reach the program’s efficiency standards.
Indeed, the average American car today weighs 23 percent less
than typical 1975 models.
Unfortunately, smaller, lighter cars
provide far less protection in a crash. A 1999 safety analysis
concluded that 46,000 post-CAFE vehicle deaths would have been
avoided if the victims had been in the heavier autos of a
generation ago. That’s about 7,700 unnecessary deaths for each
mile-per-gallon increase notched under the CAFE standards,
Coon notes.
Despite the program’s evident failures in
the arena of energy conservation and self-sufficiency—and its
less-obvious traffic safety costs—the recent spike in energy
prices has sparked renewed calls to ratchet CAFÉ standards
even higher. Some members of Congress support legislative
efforts to do just that.
Coon’s recommendation? “Back off. Stop
defending the failed CAFÉ program and start valuing human
lives by repealing the standards.”