How
You Can Help | More
Information | News
Room And Reports |
more
information > analysis
of 2001-02 legislation > vote
for a smarter, cleaner energy future - oppose
anti-environmental, anti-consumer
amendments
Vote for a Smarter, Cleaner Energy Future - Oppose
Anti-environmental, Anti-consumer
Amendments
March 12,
2002
Dear
Senator:
As the
Senate debates the Energy Policy Act of 2002, you have an
opportunity to move us forward to a smarter, cleaner energy
future focused on oil-saving efficiency measures,
diversification to clean renewable energy sources and consumer
protections. We urge you to vote for increased miles per
gallon standards for cars, light trucks and other SUVs, a
significant shift to clean energy, and protections for
consumers and sensitive public lands.
However,
some special interests are campaigning for fundamentally
flawed energy legislation that would do little if anything to
increase energy security, reduce pollution, save money, and
create jobs. Big oil and energy companies are pushing for
legislation, like the House-passed H.R. 4. This dirty and
dangerous bill would open America's special places to oil
drilling, use $38 billion in taxpayer dollars to subsidize
polluting industries that cause smog, global warming, oil
spills, and radioactive waste production, and roll back
environmental and public health protections. We urge you to
oppose any energy legislation that opens the Arctic National
Wildlife Refuge and other pristine public lands to oil and gas
drilling, forfeits a safe environment and consumer
protections, or increases taxpayer subsidies to polluters.
We urge
you to support:
- Increased Automobile Fuel Economy Standards.
Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE), or miles-per-gallon
standards, enacted in 1975, doubled fuel economy for new
cars. Unfortunately, fuel economy has reached a 21-year low.
A National Academy of Sciences report demonstrates that each
automaker could produce a fleet of cars and light trucks
that meets a fuel economy standard of 37 miles per gallon
(mpg) within 10-15 years. The Senate energy bill would
increase fuel economy to 35 mpg by 2013, saving one million
barrels of oil each day when fully implemented-more than 12
times the projected daily yield from the Arctic National
Wildlife Refuge in 2013. The bill would also improve
crashworthiness of vehicles and implement a tougher rollover
standard that would save 3,000 to 5,000 lives each year.
Unfortunately, Senators Levin (D-MI) and Bond (R-MO) are
proposing a do-nothing amendment that strips the auto safety
provisions from the bill and asks NHTSA (the National
Highway Safety Traffic Agency) to set standards. NHTSA has
failed to increase fuel economy for cars for 15 years. We
urge you to support strong CAFE standards oppose Levin-Bond.
We also urge you to vote against any efforts to roll back
the Clean Air Act vehicle emission standards.
- Renewable Energy Standards and Funding for Clean
Energy. Clean, renewable energy such as wind, geothermal
and solar energy is becoming increasingly cost-competitive,
and can help protect consumers against fluctuating fossil
fuel prices. We urge you to support the Jeffords (I-VT)
amendment to set a renewable portfolio standard, requiring
an increasing percentage of electricity to come from clean
renewable sources, reaching 20% of power generation by 2020.
This standard, combined with energy efficiency policies,
would reduce global warming pollution from power plants by
one third and could save consumers an additional $70 billion
per year by 2020, compared to business as usual. We urge you
to support renewable energy and vote for the Jeffords
amendment. We urge you to vote against a do-nothing
amendment offered by Sen. Kyl (R-AZ). Sen. Kyl's amendment
would replace renewable energy standards with a voluntary
"green pricing" provision that does not guarantee any
increase in clean renewable energy generation. We also urge
you to oppose any amendment to include Municipal Solid Waste
(garbage) incinerators in the definition of renewable
energy. These facilities are a leading source of toxic air
emissions, such as dioxin, mercury and
lead.
- Public Lands Protections. Some places are too
wild to be open to any type of industrial development, and
those that are deserve strong protections and careful
consideration. Places of incredible beauty like the Arctic
National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska, our national monuments,
and wild places across the West are all threatened by oil
and gas development. We urge you to protect these
sensitive areas from oil and gas exploration and drilling
and oppose any amendments that would allow irresponsible
drilling or otherwise reduce protections for our public
lands. There is no reason to open the Arctic National
Wildlife Refuge to oil and gas drilling. Increased fuel
economy provisions will save far more oil and save consumers
money. Please vote against cloture on any amendment to open
the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil and gas
exploration and drilling.
- Important Consumer Protections. We urge you to
support several pro-consumer amendments, including: Sen.
Wyden's (D-OR) amendment to create an Office of Consumer
Advocacy to represent consumers on energy issues before the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and other
agencies; Senator Feinstein's (D-CA) amendment to
provide for regulatory oversight by the Commodity Futures
Trading Commission (CFTC) of derivative transactions on
energy commodities; and several amendments offered by
Senators Cantwell (D-WA), Wyden (D-OR), and Dayton (D-MN)
to strengthen regulatory authority to protect the public
interest when setting rates and regulating
mergers.
Americans
deserve a smarter, cleaner energy future. Strong fuel economy
and renewable energy standards and other incentives to
increase energy efficiency and renewable energy, will save
consumers money, reduce demand for foreign oil and protect our
public health and environment. Please support these
policies and oppose any energy legislation that opens the
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and other pristine public
lands to oil and gas drilling and increases taxpayer subsidies
to polluters.
Sincerely,
Gene Karpinski Executive Director, U.S.
PIRG |
Anna Aurilio Legislative Director, U.S.
PIRG |
How
You Can Help | More
Information | News
Room And Reports |
|