|  April 25, 2002 Senate Energy Bill a Good Idea Gone 
            BadContains Renewable Energy Gains and Fuel 
            Economy Fumble
 The U.S. Senate today passed an energy bill that fails to take 
            the single most important step toward reducing the nation's oil 
            dependence -- improving the fuel economy of America's cars and 
            trucks. The Senate plan does diversify our electricity supply by 
            boosting clean, renewable energy sources. But although the bill's 
            gains make it an improvement on the Bush energy plan and the U.S. 
            House of Representatives' energy bill -- both developed for and by 
            polluting energy companies -- the Senate energy bill is yet another 
            failed attempt to develop a sound energy policy. Alan Nogee, UCS Clean Energy Program Director, on renewable 
            energy and energy efficiency:"One of the few bright spots in the 
            Senate bill was setting the first-ever federal renewable energy 
            standard, which requires that all electric utilities obtain a 
            minimum of 10 percent of their electricity from wind, solar, 
            geothermal and other renewable sources by 2020.
 "Though utilities were able to significantly weaken Sen. 
            Daschle's original proposal, this provision, along with expanded tax 
            credits for renewable energy, should still double the amount of 
            renewable energy that would otherwise have been generated in 2020. 
            It is crucial that there be no further weakening of this clean 
            energy provision in the conference to reconcile the Senate and House 
            bills." David Friedman, UCS Senior Analyst, on fuel economy and tax 
            credits:"The Senate plan weakens the existing fuel economy 
            standard for cars and trucks [24 miles per gallon] by nearly 1 mpg 
            [to 23 mpg] in the coming decade.  The Senate voted to extend a 
            loophole that allows automakers to claim fuel economy credits for 
            vehicles that could, but almost never do, run on alternative fuels 
            like ethanol.  In contrast, the original Senate language would 
            have improved the fuel economy standard to 35 mpg by 2015.  By 
            voting to reject fuel economy language and oil savings goals, the 
            Senate deepens our oil dependence.
 "The Senate bill also freezes the fuel economy standard of pickup 
            trucks at the current light truck standard of 20.7 mpg -- 
            permanently saddling pickup drivers with unnecessarily high gasoline 
            costs and miring almost 40 percent of the light trucks currently 
            sold at an outdated fuel economy standard. "The only glimmer of hope on vehicles will be if the Senate's 
            performance-based tax credits for hybrid, fuel cell and true 
            alternative fuel vehicles are not weakened during energy bill 
            negotiations between the House and Senate. These credits will 
            encourage marked improvements in the performance of advanced 
            vehicles and help give them a foothold in the marketplace."   |