Union of Concerned Scientists
Search   
Home About UCS Take Action Support Us Publications Greentips
Clean Vehicles Food Vehicles Environment Energy Security
Clean Vehicles

campaign
Fuel Economy: Going Farther on a Gallon of Gas

What's Happening Now
Squandered Opportunities
History

Background

 
 
 
related links
 
 
 in clean vehicles
  Fuel Economy Standards
  Greener SUVs
  Cars and Trucks and Global Warming
  UCS Report -- Drilling in Detroit


The United States is the world's largest consumer of oil, with two-thirds of that oil going to fuel the transportation sector. Our thirst for oil has far-reaching implications, ranging from compromising our energy security to polluting the air we breathe and contributing to global warming. The simplest, most cost-effective way to reduce the United States' consumption of oil is to increase the fuel economy of motor vehicles. Improving the fuel economy of passenger vehicles to an average of 40 mpg would reduce our dependence on foreign oil, cut global warming emissions and save consumers thousands of dollars annually at the gas pump. Detroit has the technology to accomplish this while maintaining the power, safety, and performance that consumers demand.

What's Happening Now

On April 1, 2003, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) announced it would increase the fuel economy of SUVs and other light trucks. This rule increases the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards for light trucks by 1.5 mpg. Under the new rule, the current standard of 20.7 mpg will increase to 21.0 mpg for model year (MY) 2005, 21.6 mpg for MY 2006, and 22.2 mpg for MY 2007. Close analysis reveals that when taking into account the many loopholes the auto industry currently enjoys, the oil savings from the proposal will be negligible. In fact, this increase in fuel economy is less aggressive than what the automakers have said they would do voluntarily by 2005. (See UCS press release)

Squandered Opportunities

In August 2001, the House of Representatives passed the House Energy Bill that included an amendment offered by Richard Burr (R-NC) to save 5 billion gallons of gasoline from light trucks by 2010. This is the equivalent of raising the fuel economy of light trucks (i.e., SUVs, pickups, and minivans) by less than 1 mile per gallon, and amounts to saving only one day's worth of oil per year.

In March 2002, Senators John Kerry (D-MA) and John McCain (R-AZ) introduced an amendment to the Senate Energy Bill that would have increased fuel economy standards for cars and light trucks to 36 mpg by 2015. Instead of taking this meaningful step to require the industry to produce cars and trucks that can go farther on a gallon of gas, the Senate overwhelmingly chose to support an amendment conceived by Senators Levin (D-MI) and Bond (R-MO) that punted the issue to NHTSA and added loopholes that would actually increase oil use. The Levin-Bond amendment was passed by 62 votes, effectively killing the Kerry-McCain amendment. If Kerry-McCain had been enacted, we could be saving 2 million barrels a day--almost as much oil as we currently import from the Persian Gulf--by 2020. The Senate then displayed convoluted logic by first passing the decision on fuel economy standards to NHTSA and then voting for an amendment that permanently exempts pickup trucks from the agency's future rulemakings.

The House and Senate energy bills were then "conferenced" in the Energy Conference Committee, which is made up of members of both the House and Senate, to reconcile any differences into one bill. In September 2002, the Levin-Bond amendment and the pickup truck exemption were removed from the conference energy bill. A version of the Burr amendment that calls for a less than 1 mpg increase in fuel economy by 2012, plus an additional requirement for the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) to study fuel economy further, remained in the conference bill. The 107th Congress adjourned in November 2002 without passing a final energy bill. As of April 10, 2003, hearings by the 108th Congress on the new energy bill were under way.

History

The US Congress established CAFE standards in 1975, largely in response to the oil embargo of 1973. Gasoline prices skyrocketed and the United States was caught flat on its feet. Cars and light trucks were heavy and inefficient, with cars averaging 13.5 mpg and trucks averaging 11.6 mpg. Congress established a phase-in of new fuel economy standards that brought cars up to 27.5 mpg, but delegated the responsibility of setting standards for light trucks, now set at 20.7 mpg, to the Department of Transportation (DOT). 

Light Truck Loophole

At the time that Congress passed the CAFE law, light trucks were allowed to meet a lower fuel economy standard because they constituted only 20 percent of the vehicle market and were used primarily as work vehicles. Today, light trucks comprise nearly 50 percent of the new-vehicle market, and are primarily used as passenger cars. In 2001, the average fuel economy of new vehicles sold was at its lowest point since 1980. The proliferation of SUVs takes advantage of a loophole that allows what are essentially passenger cars to comply with the lower light truck standards, driving up the use of oil. 

The Bryan-Gorton Bill

In 1990, Senators Richard Bryan and Slade Gorton tried to reverse the downward trend in fuel economy by sponsoring a bill to raise fuel economy standards for both cars and light trucks over 10 years. The bill called for a 40 percent increase in CAFE standards. Had this bill become law, today’s cars would average 40 mpg and light trucks 29 mpg. The United States would save 1 million barrels of oil a day (mbd) in 2003, on its way to saving 3 mbd.  Instead, the average fuel economy of new vehicles is at a 21-year low.

Fuel Economy Standards Frozen

Starting with fiscal year 1996, members of the House of Representatives inserted a rider on the Department of Transportation appropriations bill, in effect freezing CAFE standards at their current levels. The "CAFE freeze rider" prevented the DOT from even studying the need and technological feasibility of new CAFE standards. In 1999, Senators Slade Gorton (R-WA), Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), and Richard Bryan (D-NV) sponsored a sense of the Senate resolution opposing the House-based rider, which 40 senators supported. These same senators sponsored a similar resolution opposing the freeze rider on the 2001 DOT funding bill. Just before the vote, however, senators representing the auto industry agreed to break the freeze on studying fuel economy. Congress ordered a study by the NAS to determine the effectiveness of the CAFE program and make recommendations for moving forward with new standards.  

NAS Fuel Economy Report--Fuel Economy Standards Would
Reduce Oil Dependence

Issued in July 2001, the NAS fuel economy report concludes that the current standards save 2.8 mbd. Looking forward, the NAS fuel economy report indicates that, using existing technology, the passenger vehicle fleet could reach an average of nearly 40 mpg. The report also finds that the auto industry could meet higher fuel economy standards while maintaining auto safety, and that new fuel economy standards could cost-effectively reduce our dependence on oil, improve the nation’s terms of trade, and reduce global warming pollution from passenger vehicles.

 

In this Section

Program Overview
Advanced Vehicles
Cars and SUVs
Trucks and Buses
Archive


Contents


Home | Search | Contact | Sitemap
© Union of Concerned Scientists
Page Last Revised: 04.10.2003