Skip banner Home   Sources   How Do I?   Site Map   What's New   Help  
Search Terms: basic education, international
  FOCUS™    
Edit Search
Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed   Previous Document Document 86 of 298. Next Document

Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company  
The New York Times

June 2, 2002, Sunday, Late Edition - Final

SECTION: Section 4; Page 18; Column 6; Editorial Desk 

LENGTH: 215 words

HEADLINE: Global Education: Reach Ever Higher

BODY:

To the Editor:

Amartya Sen is correct to point out the value of basic education to economic and human development ("To Build a Country, Build a Schoolhouse," Op-Ed, May 27). The United Nations' goal of achieving universal basic education, though important, is not ambitious enough.

Secondary education is also essential if the benefits that Professor Sen describes, particularly for young women, are to be realized. Evidence shows that secondary education postpones the age of marriage and provides young women with better knowledge of their bodies and the importance of family planning.

Secondary education also provides young women with advanced skills necessary for narrowing gender gaps in the labor force. More study is necessary to identify thresholds at which additional years of education translate into specific health, economic and demographic benefits.

The American Academy of Arts and Sciences is assembling an international team of experts to undertake this work. But we know enough to be sure that secondary education should not be neglected.
 
MARTIN MALIN
Cambridge, Mass., May 29, 2002
 
The writer is staff director of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences Project on Universal Basic and Secondary Education.
 

http://www.nytimes.com

LOAD-DATE: June 2, 2002




Previous Document Document 86 of 298. Next Document
Terms & Conditions   Privacy   Copyright © 2003 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.