Copyright 2002 eMediaMillWorks, Inc.
(f/k/a Federal
Document Clearing House, Inc.)
Federal Document Clearing House
Congressional Testimony
June 19, 2002 Wednesday
SECTION: CAPITOL HILL HEARING TESTIMONY
LENGTH: 1877 words
COMMITTEE:
SENATE HEALTH, EDUCATION, LABOR AND PENSIONS
HEADLINE: NSF REAUTHORIZATION
TESTIMONY-BY: RITA COLWELL, DIRECTOR
BODY: Statement of Dr. Rita Colwell Director
National Science Foundation
Before the Senate Health, Education, Labor
and Pensions Committee
June 19, 2002
Chairman Kennedy, Senator
Gregg, and Members of the Committee, thank you for providing this opportunity to
discuss the President's budget request for the National Science Foundation.
America's present and future strength, prosperity and global preeminence
depend directly on fundamental research.
Every year, the Foundation's
optimal use of limited public funds has relied on two conditions -- number one,
ensuring that our research and education investments are aimed - and
continuously re-aimed - at the frontiers of understanding.
And number
two, certifying that virtually every dollar goes to competitive meritreviewed,
and time-limited awards with clear criteria for success.
Moreover, NSF
puts the greatest share of its resources where they will do the most good: in
the nation's colleges and universities where, in addition to generating the
truly new ideas that define the future, every dollar invested contributes to
developing and training the next generation of researchers and educators. NSF
has been proactive in implementing the President's Management Agenda, and we
welcome -- and apply -- input from many sources to continuously improve the way
we manage programs at NSF.
When these conditions are met, our nation
gets the most intellectual and economic leverage from its research and education
investments.
The National Science Foundation is requesting
$
5.036 billion for FY2003, $
240 million or
five percent more than the previous fiscal year. For the United States to stay
on the leading edge of discovery and innovation, we cannot do less.
Let
me stress that the priority setting process at NSF results from continual
consultation with the research community. New programs are added or enhanced
only after seeking the combined expertise and experience of the science and
engineering community, the Director and Deputy, and the National Science Board.
Programs are initiated or enlarged based on considerations of their
intellectual merit, broader impacts of the research, the importance to science
and engineering, balance across fields and disciplines, and synergy with
research in other agencies and nations. NSF coordinates its research with our
sister research agencies both informally -- by program officers being actively
informed of other agencies' programs - and formally, through interagency
agreements that spell out the various agency roles in research activities.
Partnerships among agencies are proliferating mainly because they offer
the best hope for finding answers to some of the most challenging research
problems. These partnerships are truly changing the face of science. NSF is the
lead agency for two multi-agency Administration initiatives in the most
promising research fields, information technology and nanotechnology.Knowledge
breakthroughs in these two areas alone will fundamentally change the face of
research in research areas across the board.
I am keenly aware and
deeply appreciative of this committee's strong interest in improving the quality
of education in this country, so I wanted to take a few minutes to discuss some
of the steps NSF is taking to strengthen our math and science education.
Everyone agrees that we need to improve our preK-12 education system.
America's technology-driven economy demands innovative thinkers to create new
industries and fill the ever more demanding jobs these new industries generate.
How can it be at the dawn of the 21 sc century, that we still see news
stories about "why Johnnie can't read" or "why Johnnie can't count?"
How
can it be that a nation that spends more than $
300 billion on
public K-12 education invests less than one-tenth of one percent of that amount
to determine "what "actually works," and to find ways to improve educational
technologies? NSF does not have a magic wand, but we do have an impressive
portfolio of research and education programs designed to help address these and
other challenging problems.
One of the most encouraging highlights of
our FY03 budget request is a second installment of $
200 million
for President's Bush's national five-year, $
1 billion
Math and Science Partnership Program (MSP) to ensure that "no
child is left behind." The strategic focus of MSP is to link the nation's higher
education institutions with local, regional and state school districts and other
partners. MSP calls for a significant commitment by colleges and universities to
help improve the quality of science and mathematics instruction in our schools.
Additionally, the program calls for greater investment in the recruitment and
professional development of highly competent science and math teachers. I would
like to note that NSF and the Department of Education are working closely
together to effectively manage this joint investment in math and science
education. Review panels are currently underway for the first round of MSP
proposals, and Department of Education staff is fully involved in this process
along with NSF staff.
For MSP to succeed we must first ensure that
productive partnerships are established between schools and colleges. A second
distinguishing feature of MSP is that it will not be an isolated set of local
partnerships, but will become part of a national science, technology,
engineering and mathematics (STEM) education portfolio of interconnected sites
that will share successful methods so that all students benefit. MSP seeks to
improve student achievement in mathematics and science by all students, at all
pre-college levels. NSF doesn't have all the answers, but through programs like
MSP, our education portfolio is evolving to meet the critical needs of our
nation's future workforce.
And that S&T workforce should also
reflect the face of America. We must attract more of our youngsters, especially
minorities and women, to pursue careers in science, mathematics, technology, and
engineering. We must draw upon our full talent pool.
One of the steps
NSF is taking to attract more of the nation's most promising students to science
and engineering is an investment of approximately $
37 million
in FY03 to increase annual stipends for graduate fellows to encourage them to
pursue technical careers. Other NSF programs geared toward helping this
underrepresented segment of our population can hopefully make a difference in
their recruitment, retention, and advancement in technical fields.
The
budget also includes funding for six priority areas, including
$
221 million for nanotechnology research, $
286
million for information technology research, and $
60 million as
part of a new priority area in mathematical and statistical sciences research
that will ultimately advance interdisciplinary science and engineering.
$
185 million is directed toward NSF's Learning for the 21"
Century Workforce priority area - including $
20 million to fund
three to four new multi-disciplinary. multi- institutional Science of Learning
Centers to enhance our understanding of how we learn, how the brain stores
information, and how we can best use new information technology to promote
learning.
We are also requesting $
10 million to seed a
new priority area in the social, behavioral, and economic sciences to explore
the complex interactions between new technology and society so that we can
better anticipate and prepare for their consequences.
The budget
requests $
79 million for research on biocomplexity in the
environment. This builds upon past investments to study the remarkable and
dynamic web of interrelationships that arise when living things at all levels
interact with their environment. Research in two new areas this year --
microbial genome sequencing and ecology of infectious diseases -- will help
develop strategies to assess and manage the risks of infectious diseases,
invasive species, and biological weapons.
I should add that as part of
the Administration's new multi- agency Climate Change Research Initiative, we
will implement a $
15 million research program to advance
understanding in highly focused areas of climate science, to reduce uncertainty
and facilitate policy decisions.Our budget also includes $
76
million for programs slated to be transferred to NSF from NOAA, EPA, and the
USGS.
Although we did not seek these transfers, we take considerable
pride in the fact that of the 26 Federal agencies judged by OMB in five key
management areas, only the National Science Foundation received a green light.
NSF is noted for its expertise and success in funding competitive research, and
this was certainly a factor in this recognition.
In large facilities, we
will continue support for the next phase of construction of the Atacama Large
Millimeter Array (ALMA). New construction projects in the FY2003 budget include
two prototype sites of the National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) at a
cost of $
12 million to analyze data to detect abrupt changes or
long-term trends in the environment. The budget also requests
$
35 million for EarthScope to detect and investigate
earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, and landslides on the North American continent.
The events following September 11 demonstrated our capacity to engage
the research community in ways that are immediately responsive to national needs
- ranging from the analysis of a catastrophic structural collapse to the use of
robotics in victim location. We owe this flexibility to a highly trained
scientific and engineering workforce capable of selecting the most interesting
and challenging problems for their research. It is this flexibility, enabled by
the merit review system that makes our science and technology enterprise the
envy of the world.
The Bush Administration has recognized that we need
to invest more in scientific and technological research - across the board.
Other nations are building up their R&D commitments. US investment in
broad-based fundamental research - which takes place largely in our universities
- must not be allowed to slip. I think Harold Varmus said it best when he said,
"The NIH does a magnificent job but it does not hold all the keys to success.
The work of several science agencies is required for advances in medical
sciences, and the health of some of those agencies is suffering."
The
National Science Foundation is the only Federal agency whose primary mission is
to advance science, engineering and mathematics across all disciplines. By doing
so we support national defense, help our country remain internationally
competitive, and provide a better standard of living for our citizens. As we
work to develop the finest scientists and engineering for the 21 st century, our
human resources policy must move beyond simply the supply and demand of
personnel and address the composition of our science and engineering workforce.
There is much room for needed improvement and continued policy considerations.
Mr. Chairman, for those who want to examine the NSF budget in detail, it
is fully laid out on our web site. I would be pleased to respond to any
questions that the committee may have.
LOAD-DATE: June 21, 2002