Skip banner Home   Sources   How Do I?   Site Map   What's New   Help  
Search Terms: "math and science partnership"
  FOCUS™    
Edit Search
Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed   Previous Document Document 6 of 11. Next Document

Copyright 2001 P.G. Publishing Co.  
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (Pennsylvania)

December 23, 2001 Sunday REGION EDITION

SECTION: NATIONAL, Pg.A-6

LENGTH: 1522 words

HEADLINE: HOW SCHOOL BILL AFFECTS STATE

BYLINE: JANE ELIZABETH, POST-GAZETTE EDUCATION WRITER

BODY:
The federal education bill approved by the Senate Tuesday and the House the previous week calls for the "most massive shift" in schools in more than three decades, says U.S. Secretary of Education Rod Paige.

But even though Pennsylvanians, just like people in the rest of the nation, will have to learn new buzzwords such as "adequate yearly progress" and "reconstitution," some of the changes ordered by the education act won't break new ground here:

*Statewide report cards for school? Got that.

*Tutoring money for students who are flunking state tests? Already there.

*The threat of state takeover for failing school districts? Done that, too.

Not coincidentally, one of the forces behind President Bush's sweeping "No Child Left Behind Act of 2001" is Eugene W. Hickok Jr., former Pennsylvania education secretary and now deputy education secretary in the Bush administration.

"This is a fundamental change in how education is done" in much of the nation, Hickok said in a telephone interview Thursday that included Paige, a former Houston superintendent of schools.

A major difference for Pennsylvanians, Hickok acknowledged, is that the federal law will reach into Pennsylvania with a more powerful arm. There are no escape clauses, no "opt-out" provisions, no appeals. If states don't do what the act says, when it says, federal funding will be cut.

"It's a pretty tight law," Hickok said.

Allocations for states haven't been decided, but nationwide, up to $22 billion is expected to be distributed this fiscal year. That's a 20 percent increase over last year.

One of the more intriguing mandates calls on states to identify "persistently dangerous" public schools. Students in those schools, or any student who's the victim of a violent crime at any public school, will be allowed to transfer to a "safe" school within the district or to a charter school, and the home district will have to pay the cost of transportation.

At the same time, the bill provides more money for student locker searches, drug testing, school violence phone lines, employee background checks and programs to help teachers spot suicidal students.

Elsewhere in the 1,800-page bill, there are programs to help more men become elementary school teachers and to help more girls take advanced science courses. There are mandates that districts get more parents involved in their schools, that biology classes mention the controversy surrounding evolution, and that teachers be protected from "frivolous lawsuits" when trying to "maintain order and discipline in the classroom."

Even the architects of the earlier versions of the bill haven't yet absorbed or resolved every detail of the compromise bill.

The initial legislation was batted about the House and Senate by Democrats and Republicans for a year without passage.

Then came Sept. 11. After the terrorist attacks, bipartisan bickering dissipated, and the bill made history last week as the most significant education reform since federal involvement in education began in 1965.

Here are some of the major elements that will affect Pennsylvania students, educators and parents.

Testing

Beginning in 2004-05, pupils in grades three through eight must be given a state-designed math and reading test each year. Science tests will begin in 2007-08.

Eighth- and 11th-graders will continue to be tested.

Pennsylvania already has its Pennsylvania System of School Assessment (PSSA) tests for pupils in grades five, eight and 11, and it's likely that will meet the federal requirement, although it will have to be expanded to cover the third, fourth, sixth and seventh grades.

Paige said, however, "It would be premature to put the Good Housekeeping seal of approval on any [testing] system."

Pennsylvania pupils now also will be required to participate in the National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP) tests, which most of the state's school districts historically have resisted. All fourth- and eighth-graders will be required to take these national math and reading tests, and scores will be used to measure progress nationwide.

Because of all these tests, "It's going to be difficult to ignore problems where they exist," Hickok said.

Standards

The law says all states must develop standards -- what children should be taught and when -- by 2005-06. Pennsylvania is well on its way. Standards in all subjects are expected to be in place by the 2003-04 school year.

Student improvement

Every pupil and every school must show "adequate yearly progress" -- or AYP -- on the state and NAEP tests. In 12 years, every pupil in America must perform at the "proficient" level. But it's left to each state to define "adequate progress" and "proficient."

Pennsylvania's tests now have a "proficient" category, and many schools are a long way from having 100 percent of their pupils at that level. At Allderdice High School, long considered one of the city's top high schools, 52.8 percent of students scored "proficient" or better in math, and 50 percent did so in reading. (Most recent PSSA scores can be found at www.pde.psu.edu/esscores.html.)

Also, the new law will provide more money to pay for low-income pupils to take Advanced Placement tests. Now, those fees must be paid by the school district, and some choose not to pay.

Teacher quality

The federal law will demand that teachers are properly certified. For example, those who teach algebra or special education must be specifically licensed to do so.

The law also contains a mandate, not yet detailed, that all teachers be "highly qualified" by the end of the 2005-06 school year. Federal money will be provided to help recruit high-quality candidates and to offer more training for teachers.

If a local school district doesn't make adequate progress in improving its teaching force within three years, the state can intervene by withholding funds in some cases and instituting improvement programs.

Bad schools

Schools that haven't made "AYP" for two consecutive years must come up with a plan to improve, and they'll get federal funds to aid those efforts. But more significantly, those schools must allow pupils to transfer to another school in the district or a charter school -- and the school must pick up the transportation costs.

After three years of poor performance, schools must pay for tutoring for pupils. After four years, schools may be "reconstituted" by the state. That is, the entire staff and curriculum can be replaced. After five years, the state or a private contractor could take over the school.

"We're going to hold schools accountable," Paige said. "One year of a student's life in failure is a long time. What would be the reason to keep them in five years?" Pennsylvania already has its "empowerment act" to deal with poor-performing schools. Currently, there are 12 "empowerment districts" and the clock won't start over for them when the federal bill is enacted. Those districts will immediately fall under the federal rules.

Along with punishment for poor performance, the law will offer federal money to reward teachers whose pupils have made outstanding progress, and who have helped close the "achievement gap" between minority and white pupils and poor and wealthier pupils.

Pennsylvania currently rewards schools -- although not teachers directly -- that improve state test scores and attendance rates.

Teacher shortage

In an effort to find more teachers, especially for hard-to-fill subject areas or districts, the federal act will provide money to help states come up with "alternative certification" programs.

Typically, that means recruiting candidates from other professions and putting them through a streamlined program to become teachers. Former Gov. Tom Ridge developed such a program in Pennsylvania three years ago, but it has been tied up ever since by a lawsuit filed by teachers unions.

Report cards

Pennsylvania already has two types of "report cards" to give parents an idea how schools are performing. The federal law asks for a few additional measurements that the state currently doesn't offer, such as how minority groups are scoring on tests and the professional qualifications of teachers.

Private schools, home schools

Private schools will share in the $7.5 billion in grants for special education, the $2.85 billion for teacher improvement, and, for the first time, will share in the money designated for community learning centers, reading programs and math and science partnerships with local businesses and universities.

Home schools are generally excluded from mandates in the federal act. The bill also makes it clear that the current "Gun Free Schools Act" does not apply to home schools.

Teacher aides

Currently, teacher aides need only a high school education to get a job in Pennsylvania. Under the federal law, teacher aides must have at least two years of college or must have passed a "rigorous" state-designed test of their reading, math and writing skills.

In Pennsylvania, aides make up about 10 percent of the statewide teaching staff.

LOAD-DATE: December 23, 2001




Previous Document Document 6 of 11. Next Document
Terms & Conditions   Privacy   Copyright © 2003 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.