FYI Number 4: January 10, 2002

Highlights of Science Policy and Budget Developments in 2001

A month-by-month review of some of the events reported on in FYI in 2001:

JANUARY: Confirmation hearing for former Senator Spencer Abraham (R-MI) to be new Energy Secretary goes well, one senator saying "there's no question, you are stepping into a quagmire of problems." Defense Secretary-Designate Donald Rumsfeld questioned about National Missile Defense System and defense S&T spending at his confirmation hearing.

FEBRUARY: Kansas State Board of Education accepts standards requiring twelfth grade students to "understand the major concepts of the theory of biological evolution" and "develop an understanding of the origin and evolution of the dynamic earth system." Education reform takes center stage on both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue. Hart-Rudman commission recommends that "The President should propose, and the Congress should support, doubling the U.S. government's investment in science and technology research and development by 2010." Bush Administration releases FY 2002 budget "blueprint" that appears to provide a total $300 million increase for NSF, NASA, and DOE science.

MARCH: President Bush, responding to a letter from four senators about the Kyoto Protocol, states his opposition to mandatory power plant carbon dioxide emission reductions. House Science Committee releases bipartisan report expressing concern about the "minuscule" budget increase proposed for NSF, and is "particularly concerned" about the future of the DOE Office of Science. President Bush nominates Floyd Kvamme, a venture capitalist, to be co-chair of PCAST.

APRIL: Energy Secretary Abraham decides not to make any changes in the National Ignition Facility's design, construction, or operation. Administration releases detailed FY 2002 budget request: NSF, up 1.3%; DOE science, up 0.1%; NASA, up 1.8%; DOD S&T, up 2.1%; NIST, down 18.4%; USGS, down 9.4%. Blue Ribbon panel established to study effectiveness of transferring NSF astronomical responsibilities to NASA. Proposed USGS budget cut receives much criticism at congressional hearings.

MAY: Twenty-two representatives introduce Fusion Energy Science Act to authorize increase in spending. VA/HUD chairman James Walsh (R-NY) describes FY 2002 NSF budget request as "wholly inadequate" at appropriations hearing.

JUNE: House Science subcommittee chairman Roscoe Bartlett (R-MD) at hearing on DOE Office of Science points to many empty Member chairs, and remarks about "the problem we face in attracting attention" to Office of Science. National Science Board releases draft report on the allocation of scientific funding. Rep. Rush Holt (D-NJ) introduces bill to reestablish congressional Office of Technology Assessment. Advanced Technology Program gets high marks at House Science subcommittee hearing. Brookhaven Laboratory Director John Marburger nominated as OSTP director.

JULY: Administration provides details of long-awaited FY 2002 DOD request, asking for 2.4% cut in defense S&T spending. House appropriators recommend increases of 9.4% for NSF and 4.5% for NASA (both higher than later Senate FY 2002 figures.) Appropriators vote more money for DOE science programs than Administration request. NRC report identifies priority areas for physics research. House appropriators recommend elimination of funding for new ATP grants in 2002, in direct opposition to later Senate bill.

AUGUST: House and Senate start crafting final education reauthorization bill. Independent panel begins review of troubled international space station program.

SEPTEMBER: NRC committee recommends maintaining separate NSF and NASA astronomy programs. Report released by NRC committee showing almost 25% decline in federal funding for physics from FY 1993 to 1999. Administration announces effort to develop evaluation criteria for federal applied and basic research programs.

OCTOBER: John Marburger receives enthusiastic reception at Senate confirmation hearing. Quadrennial Defense Review Report calls for 3% of total DOD budget to be spent on defense S&T. USGS receives 3.5% increase in FY 2002 budget.

NOVEMBER: FY 2002 DOE physics funding remains relatively constant in new appropriations bill. Task Force finds space station program plan for executing FY 2002-2006 budget "is not credible." Final FY 2002 appropriations bill provides 8.4% increase for NSF and 3.8% increase for NASA. Appropriations report language issued that is skeptical about scaled-down space station configuration. Bill passed giving ATP program an increase of almost 27% in FY 2002. Sean O'Keefe nominated as new NASA administrator. Study released showing little change in student achievement in science from 1996 in grades four and eight.

DECEMBER: O'Keefe declares, at Senate confirmation hearing, that performance and outcomes "are [what we are] going to be about at NASA." Senators express skepticism about proposal to scale-down space station. Appropriations bill passed raising defense S&T by 11.0%, to a total which is 3.1% of the overall DOD bill. Congress passes education reauthorization bill, but later appropriates only $12.5 million for new math and science partnership program.

Richard M. Jones
Media and Government Relations Division
American Institute of Physics
fyi@aip.org
(301) 209-3095

Back to FYI Home

Search FYI
Subscribe to FYI
2002 Archives
2001 Archives
2000 Archives
1999 Archives
Back to FYI Home