ASME International


A weekly review of the latest legislative & regulatory news from Washington.

March 27, 2002

**Be sure to "Refresh" this page on your web browser to view the most recent version of Capitol Update **

THIS WEEK AT A GLANCE...

Aeronautics R&T Programs Examined in ASME Statement on NASA's FY2003 Budget Request
--Continued Decline in Aeronautics R&T Addressed

ASME Releases Statement on EPA's FY2003 Budget Request for Research and Development
--Task Force Recommends Keeping STAR Fellowship at EPA
Nanotechnology Reception Held on Capitol Hill
--Exhibitors Include ASME's Nanotechnology Institute
Working Luncheon Held on the Future of Math and Science Partnerships
--Representatives Ehlers, Holt, and Boehlert Attend to Support Coalition's Effort
House Science Committee Releases FY2003 Views and Estimates
--Members Still Concerned about the Lack of Balance in R&D Portfolio
Members in Mississippi and Ohio Concerned about Tort Reform
--Letters Delivered to Key Leadership in Both States
   

THIS WEEK...

ASME EXAMINES AERONAUTICS R&T PROGRAMS IN NASA'S FY2003 BUDGET REQUEST

The Aviation Research and Technology Task Force of ASME's Aerospace Division of the Council on Engineering recently entered its position statement on NASA's FY2003 Budget request into the hearing record for the Subcommittee on Veterans Affairs, Housing and Urban Development (VA-HUD) and Independent Agencies of the Senate Appropriations Committee.

The position statement addresses the Aeronautics R&T programs within NASA's Aerospace Technology Enterprise. In recent years, the Task Force has written at length about its concerns that reducing federal funding for aviation research and technology would jeopardize the nation's leadership in providing the technologies needed to develop the next generation aircraft, improving aviation safety and security, and attracting the next generation of scientists and engineers.

Over the past decade, funding for NASA's aeronautics research and technology program has fallen by approximately 50 percent, and this trend is continuing. The Administration's FY2003 request of $541.4M for aeronautics is a reduction of $58M from FY2002 appropriated funding. The position statement acknowledges NASA's recently released "Aeronautics Blueprint" and encourages sustained partnerships among the key agencies to develop a national aviation research and technology policy to turn the Aeronautics Blueprint into reality. The statement also supports recommendations in a report recently released by the "Commission on the Future of the U.S. Aerospace Industry" calling for the creation of a "multi-agency task force with the leadership to develop and implement an integrated plan to transform our air transportation system." The Commission's report also recommends significant increases in NASA R&D.

The position statement is available to review on ASME's Government Relations website at http://www.asme.org/gric/ps/2002/02-11.htmlAdditional information about ASME's Aerospace Division is available online at http://www.asme.org/divisions/aerospace/. For more information about this issue, contact Kathryn Holmes at holmesk@asme.org.

ASME RELEASES STATEMENT ON EPA'S FY2003 BUDGET REQUEST FOR RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

The EPA Task Force of ASME's Environmental Engineering Division of the Council on Engineering recently submitted its statement on EPA's FY2003 Budget request into the hearing record for the Subcommittee on Veterans Affairs, Housing and Urban Development (VA-HUD) and Independent Agencies of the Senate Appropriations Committee.

In its position statement, the Task Force noted that, because of the complex nature of environmental issues, it is essential that EPA base its policies and recommendations on sound science. A strong research and development program is critical for the on-going development of scientific based decision-making.

The Task Force supports: strong input and involvement of the Science Advisory Board in helping set EPA research priorities; focusing on national environmental priorities that impact human health, ecosystem health, and climate, specifically particulate matter, greenhouse gases, and water quality; education of future environmental professionals and building interdisciplinary teams through the support of extramurally-funded research; and building a strong science and technology base, both within EPA and through partnerships with industry and other federal and state government agencies.

The Task Force also expressed concern that the transfer of EPA's environmental education program to the National Science Foundation for FY2003 could have an adverse impact on environmental education. The Task Force was particularly concerned about the elimination of the STAR Fellowship Program, which in the past has provided a funding source for graduate students interested in solving environmental problems, allowing them to undertake research in areas directly relevant to EPA's mission and objectives. The Task Force believes the EPA would be a better steward of the environmental education initiatives.

The Task Force also recommended that the overall decline in funding for physical sciences and engineering within the Federal budget over the past decade be reversed in order to ensure that complex problems associated with issues such as environmental contamination and public health can be addressed.

The position statement is available to review on ASME's Government Relations website at http://www.asme.org/gric/ps/2002/02-10.htmlAdditional information about ASME's Environmental Engineering Division is available online at http://www.asme.org/divisions/eed/ For more information about this issue, contact Kathryn Holmes atmailto:holmesk@asme.org.

NANOTECHOLOGY RECEPTION HELD ON CAPITOL HILL

On March 19, ASME, in conjunction with AAES, AIChE, and IEEE, hosted a reception at the Hyatt Regency Capitol Hill. The reception was the final event of the NSF Conference entitled "Small Wonders: Exploring the Vast Potential of Nanoscience."

Exhibitors at the event included the AAES Engineering Workforce Commission, AIChE, ASME's own Nanotechnology Institute, IEEE, the Maryland Technology Development Corporation (TEDCO), and the Initiative for Nanotechnology in Virginia (INanoVA).

Dr. Rita Colwell, Director, National Science Foundation; and Dr. Joseph Bordogna, Assistant Director, National Science Foundation; were in attendance, as well as Dr. Esin Gulari, Acting Assistant Director, NSF Engineering Directorate; Dr. M.C. "Mike" Roco, Senior Advisor for Nanotechnology, NSF Engineering Directorate; and, U.S. Representative Ruben Hinojosa (D-TX).

For more information about the "Small Wonders Conference," go to http://www.nano.gov/agenda.htm For more general information, contact Raj Manchanda, Director of ASME's Nanotechnology Institute, at manchandar@asme.org.

WORKING LUNCHEON HELD ON FUTURE OF MATH AND SCIENCE PARTNERSHIPS On March 21, ASME

hosted a working luncheon entitled "Future of the Math & Science Partnerships: A House Perspective" for the members of the Math and Science Partnerships Coalition, which is comprised of representatives from varied science and engineering professional societies.

The Math and Science Partnerships refer to a program in H.R. 1, the "No Child Left Behind Act of 2001," dedicating funds specifically to math and science education initiatives. While H.R. 1 authorized $450 Million for the Math and Science Partnerships, Congress only appropriated $12.5 million for the program in FY2002.

Representatives Vernon Ehlers (R-MI), Rush Holt (D-NJ), and House Science Committee Chairman Sherwood Boehlert (R-NY) as well as senior staff, attended the luncheon, and presented varied perspectives on the Math and Science Partnership program funding for FY2003, for which the Bush administration has again only requested $12.5 Million. All three U.S. Representatives have been consistent advocates of science, math, engineering, and technology education.

For more information, contact Patti Burgio at burgiop@asme.org.

HOUSE SCIENCE COMMITTEE RELEASES FY2003 VIEWS AND ESTIMATES

The House Science Committee recently released its recommendations, or "Views and Estimates," on the FY2003 budget. Prior to drafting the recently approved House Budget Resolution, the views had been discussed with members of the House Budget Committee. Science Committee Chairman Sherwood Boehlert (R-NY) worked closely with Budget Chairman Jim Nussle (R-IA) to ensure that the resolution included an 11.1 percent increase over FY2002 levels in the Research and Related Activities account for the National Science Foundation (NSF).

The Committee's Views and Estimates include:

  • an endorsement of the Administration's "multi-agency R&D priorities" - work on anti-terrorism, networking and information technology, nanotechnology, and climate change;
  • concerns about the balance of the federal R&D portfolio - that the biomedical sciences - in particular the National Institutes of Health (NIH) -- are growing out of proportion to any other element of the R&D budget; § a recommendation that the NSF budget be increased (exclusive of any transfers) by $420 million, or 8.8 percent, over FY2002 levels;
  • a strong suggestion to restore funding for the Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP), which helps smaller manufacturers modernize to remain competitive - the President's proposed budget would end federal support for almost all MEP centers;
  • concerns that the President's proposed budget would cut Department of Energy (DOE) programs under the Committee's jurisdiction by 2.4 percent - the Committee recommends instead that the budget use funding levels authorized under H.R. 4, the Secure America's Future Energy Act.
  • support for the President's FY2003 funding request for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) at $15 billion.

The Views and Estimates, including additional views submitted by other members of the Committee, can be found on the Science Committee website at http://www.house.gov/science.

MEMBERS IN MISSISSIPPI AND OHIO CONCERNED ABOUT TORT REFORM

In Mississippi, State Senator Kirby recently introduced tort reform legislation, S.B. 2342. Provisions affecting ASME members include eliminating joint and several liability, making defendants responsible only for their percentage of fault, placing limits of non-economic damage awards, placing caps on punitive damage awards, and revising sections of the Mississippi Code governing product liability of manufacturers and product sellers.

The bill's strongest tort reform provisions were stripped in Committee. After this occurred, the Mississippi ASME State Government Relations Chair worked with the ASME Washington Center, regional leadership, and local ASME sections to draft a letter to the leadership of the Mississippi legislature asking them to consider the original bill. This letter can be found at ASME's Washington Center's web site http://www.asme.org/gric/ps/2002/02-07.html.

In October 2001, the Ohio State Government Coordinator sent a letter to the House Civil Justice and Commercial Law Committee regarding a tort reform bill, Senate Bill 120, which would limit joint and several liability. The legislation was endorsed by the Ohio Council, the Region V leadership, and local ASME sections. Early in 2002, the legislation was re-introduced, and a new letter was sent. Copies of the most recent letter can be found at: http://www.asme.org/gric/ps/2002/02-08.html

*****************************
Melissa R. Murray Government Relations ASME International 1828 L Street, NW, Suite 906 Washington, DC 20036 Phone: 202.785.7380 Fax: 202.429.9417 Email: mailto:murraym@asme.org



If you are an ASME member and would like to have the weekly Capitol Update
delivered to you by e-mail, simply send us your name and e-mail
address here: (be sure to include your membership # after your name)

Join/Subscribe


Browse Previous Editions / Return to ASME Government Relations homepage