Skip banner Home   Sources   How Do I?   Site Map   What's New   Help  
Search Terms: stock option expensing
  FOCUS™    
Edit Search
Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed   Previous Document Document 14 of 19. Next Document

Copyright 2002 Gannett Company, Inc.  
USA TODAY

July 18, 2002, Thursday, FINAL EDITION

SECTION: NEWS; Pg. 10A

LENGTH: 421 words

HEADLINE: Stock options wrong target

BYLINE: Harris N. Miller

BODY:
Today's debate: Corporate scandals


Opposing view: Improper accounting is the problem, not a key employee benefit.

The Senate and House are right to block efforts by the anti-business crowd to make stock options a mandatory expense.


Companies that choose not to expense options already are required to account for stock-option grants to employees on their balance sheets by the footnote method, so options-related financial information is available to investors. The current attack on the use of stock options is no more than political witch hunting in the wake of the recent accounting scandals.


Forcing companies to expense options eliminates a critical incentive encouraging employee ownership, a practice that Congress has often promoted, by increasing the cost to companies of providing this benefit to their employees. If companies want to expense stock options, they can -- and many already do. That should be their choice.


A 1999 study by consulting firm William M. Mercer found that 17% of large public companies offer stock options to most or all of their employees. Although the practice is often associated with technology and Internet companies, granting options goes well beyond IT companies, including major fast-food chains and well-known retailers. Employees will lose the chance to share in their employers' successes if stock-option expensing is mandated.


Under the McCain-Levin proposal in the Senate, innovation would suffer as well. Limiting the deductions companies can take when stock options are exercised would effectively raise corporate taxes, leaving less for investment in research and development and creating a drag on the economy as a whole. Corporate spending creates jobs; inappropriate corporate taxes destroy them.


Let us be clear: Stock options are not what brought down Enron and caused thousands of employees to lose their retirement savings. Nor is accounting for options responsible for the troubles at WorldCom.


Improper and perhaps illegal accounting caused both.


Punish bad actors by creating stringent penalties for corporate malfeasance. Enact accounting reforms where appropriate. But do not harm an employee's ability to prosper with his or her company. Do not stifle innovation at the expense of our need to grow this economy by attacking an important employee benefit: stock options.


Harris N. Miller is president of the Information Technology Association of America, a trade association for the high-tech industry.


LOAD-DATE: July 25, 2002




Previous Document Document 14 of 19. Next Document
Terms & Conditions   Privacy   Copyright © 2003 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.