|
A r c h i v e d I n f o r m a t i o
nTitle IX: 25 Years of Progress -- June
1997
Achieving Success Under Title IX (continued)
Title IX has helped girls and women participate in interscholastic and
intercollegiate athletics in far greater numbers than they had in the
past. When Title IX became law, dramatic change was needed to level the
playing fields of this nation's schools and to change the perception of
the place of girls and women on them. Just one year before the enactment
of Title IX, in 1971, a Connecticut judge was allowed by law to disallow
girls from competing on a boys' high school cross country team even though
there was no girls' team at the school. And that same year, fewer than
300,000 high school girls played interscholastic sports. Today, that
number is 2.4 million.
The rise of women's basketball is illustrative of the dramatic changes
that have taken place since the enactment of Title IX. In 1972, 132,299
young girls played high school basketball. In 1994-95 the number had
increased to 412,576, an increase of over 300 percent. In the last two
years, women's basketball has come of age with the gold-medal victory of
the American women's basketball team at the 1996 Olympics, the increased
media attention to the NCAA women's basketball tournament, and the
development of two professional women's basketball leagues.
"Without Title IX, I'd be nowhere."--Cheryl
Miller, Olympic athlete Outstanding member of 1984 gold medal women's
basketball team
Girls and women also are increasingly participants in sports that have
traditionally been seen as out of bounds for women, including lacrosse,
wrestling, soccer, rugby and ice hockey. In one sport that is more and
more a favorite for young girls-- soccer--the results have led to a World
Cup championship. In 1996, the U.S. national soccer team captured the
first-ever women's Olympic medal in this sport before a crowd of 76,481,
and in doing so established its position as the world's premier women's
soccer program.
In many ways, the very image of American women in the sports arena is
being redefined by the many accomplishments of women in athletics. Women
are now seen as sports stars in their own right, from Mia Hamm in soccer
to Sheryl Swoopes in basketball. The inspiring story of Dr. Dot
Richardson, the captain of the American Olympic softball team, who
immediately left her triumph in Atlanta to begin her medical residency,
exemplifies just what has been accomplished on the field and off as a
result of Title IX.
Richardson - Olympian
Dot Richardson was 10 years old, playing catch in an Orlando,
Florida, park when a man noticed her exceptional arm and asked if she
wanted to play on his Little League team. Richardson was thrilled.
"We'll just cut your hair short," said the coach, "and call you Bob."
Richardson never believed that ball playing was reserved for boys. She
went on to become a four-time All-American in college and was named NCAA
player of the decade for the 1980s. She graduated as a physician from
the University of Louisville Medical School, often ending 20-hour
hospital shifts with workouts and practice so that she could compete in
1996 in the first women's softball appearance in the modern Olympic
Games. She hit the first home run in Olympic softball history, helping
the U.S. team win the gold medal. Richardson is now a resident in
orthopedic surgery at the University of Southern
California.
Before the passage of Title IX, athletic scholarships for college women
were rare, no matter how great their talent. After winning two gold medals
in the 1964 Olympics, swimmer Donna de Varona could not obtain a college
swimming scholarship: for women, they did not exist. It took time and
effort to improve the opportunities for young women: two years after Title
IX was voted into law, an estimated 50,000 men were attending U.S.
colleges and universities on athletic scholarships--and fewer than 50
women. In 1973, the University of Miami (Florida) awarded the first
athletic scholarships to women--a total of 15 in golf, swimming, diving,
and tennis. Today, college women receive about one-third of all athletic
scholarship dollars.
Athletic Facilities at Fresno State
University, California
Fresno State University had spent more than $15 million on
state-of-the-art facilities for men while it had spent about $300,000 on
the women's athletic facilities, which were considered substandard.
Despite this, Fresno State captured 9 of the last 12 softball conference
championships, and 5 current or former members of the Fresno State
softball team were on the U.S. Olympic softball team. To meet the
requirements of Title IX, Fresno State completed an ambitious plan
costing more than $8 million to provide equity in athletic facilities
for women. A new building for women athletes houses four new team rooms.
In addition, the women's Fresno State Bulldog Softball team has a new
stadium, which seats more than 2,500 fans. When the team last played its
traditional rival, bleachers were added for the more than 5,000 people
who filled the stadium. Coach Margie Wright, who was also a coach on the
gold medal Olympic softball team, tells her Fresno State athletes that
they got the stadium because of their hard work.
Achieving equal opportunity for women in intercollegiate sports has not
been an easy task. Some colleges have faced budgetary restraints and
others simply have been reluctant to change the status quo. Given the fact
that no federal Courts of Appeals have ruled against Title IX's athletic
provisions, however, it is clear that the immediate challenge for our
nation's higher education community is to find positive ways to comply
with the law.
Here it is important to recognize that there is no mandate under Title
IX that requires a college to eliminate men's teams to achieve compliance.
The thought that "if women are to gain opportunities, then men must lose
opportunities," presents a false dichotomy. As with other educational
aspects of Title IX, and according to the expressed will of Congress, the
regulation is intended to expand opportunities for both men and women.
Title IX: Student Participation
in Athletics
In the assessment of the "interests and abilities" portion of the
Title IX regulations, a three part test governs. As the name
suggests, this test consists of three separate and distinct parts.
All that is required under Title IX is that an institution be in
compliance with one part of that test. No one part of the test is
the predominant or "true" measure of compliance. The three parts of
the test are:
Part One: Substantial Proportionality. This part
of the test is satisfied when participation opportunities for men
and women are "substantially proportionate" to their respective
undergraduate enrollments. Part Two: History and
Continuing Practice. This part of the test is satisfied
when an institution has a history and continuing practice of program
expansion that is responsive to the developing interests and
abilities of the underrepresented sex (typically
female). Part Three: Effectively Accommodating Interests
and Abilities. This part of the test is satisfied when an
institution is meeting the interests and abilities of its female
students even where there are disproportionately fewer females than
males participating in sports. |
The critical values learned from sports participation--including
teamwork, standards, leadership, discipline, self-sacrifice and pride in
accomplishment--are being brought to the workplace as women enter
employment in greater numbers, and at higher levels than ever before. For
example, 80 percent of female managers of Fortune 500 companies have a
sports background. Also, high school girls who participate in team sports
are less likely to drop out of school, smoke, drink or become pregnant. It
is no surprise, then, that 87 percent of parents now accept the idea that
sports are equally important for boys and girls.
"I Should Watch...They Should
Compete"
"As a child, I loved athletics and physical activities. I was
talented, but my talent was not appreciated or approved of by most. I
watched my brothers compete on school teams. It didn't matter that in
the neighborhood pick-up games, I was selected before my brothers.
Society dictated that I should watch, and that they should compete. So
at home in the backyard, I would catch as my brother worked on his curve
ball, I would shag flies as he developed his batting prowess and, as I
recall, I frequently served as his tackling dummy. The brother I caught
and shagged for, and for whom I served as a tackling dummy, went on to
Georgetown University on a full athletic grant. He later became vice
president of a large banking firm. So, while I rode in the back seat on
the bus of opportunity during my lifetime, I want my daughter's daughter
and her peers to be able to select a seat based on their abilities and
their willingness to work. Don't deny them the things that I dreamed
of."-- Excerpts of a letter sent to OCR in spring 1995 by Joan
Martin, Senior Associate Director of Athletics, Monmouth University, New
Jersey
-###-
[
Achieving Success Under Title IX ]
[
The Next 25 Years ]
Last Updated -- July 10, 1997, (pjk)
|