Skip banner Home   Sources   How Do I?   Site Map   What's New   Help  
Search Terms: Title IX w/10 enforcement
  FOCUS™    
Edit Search
Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed   Previous Document Document 52 of 67. Next Document

Copyright 2002 Journal Sentinel Inc.  
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel (Wisconsin)

January 17, 2002 Thursday FINAL EDITION

SECTION: SPORTS; Pg. 01C

LENGTH: 1033 words

HEADLINE: Title IX is taken to task;
MU wrestlers part of suit filed in Washington

BYLINE: LORI NICKEL AND NAHAL TOOSI of the Journal Sentinel staff

BODY:
The National Wrestling Coaches Association, along with the defunct wrestling club team at Marquette University, filed a lawsuit Wednesday in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in Washington D.C. against the Department of Education. The lawsuit challenges the proportionality rule of Title IX and the way the federal law is enforced.

Marquette University itself is not involved in the lawsuit. The team's former participants and alumni supporters are named as plaintiffs, with the NWCA as the lead plaintiff.

This marks the first suit brought against the federal government over Title IX by an athletic association since the National Collegiate Athletic Association sued unsuccessfully in 1976.

Past lawsuits over Title IX have been filed by student athletes against individual schools to protect or reinstate athletic programs that were cut over Title IX. Not one of those lawsuits has been successful.

"The immediate objective is to remove the gender quota," said Eric Pearson, the co-chair of the Title IX committee of the NWCA.

In 1996, Title IX's enforcement laws were toughened. Title IX prohibits sex discrimination in education by institutions that receive federal funding. Schools had to comply with the 1972 federal law in one of three ways: by showing a recent history of adding women's athletic teams, by proving that the interests of the student body were being met, or by proportionality.

Proportionality doesn't count the number of opportunities available to men and women, but rather the actual number of individual men and women competing in sports.

"Many universities feel the only way to avoid a sure lawsuit is to use this proportionality interpretation," said NWCA's executive director of three years, Mike Moyer. "We would like to see decisions made truly on accommodating the interests of the students."

For example, if there are 40 spots available on the men's baseball team, there should be 40 spots available on the women's softball team, according to the NWCA.

Instead, with the proportionality rule of Title IX, the individuals on rosters are counted. Using the same example as above, if only 20 women show up to make that 40-woman roster softball team, then in most cases only 20 men would be allowed to play on the baseball team, even if 40 men were interested.

Proportionality is supposed to reflect the gender makeup of the student body. Theoretically, if there are 51% female students on campus, then 51% of the school's athletes should be female.

Wrestling program hit

Marquette University's men's wrestling program was cut from the athletic department budget in 1994. The program continued, at the varsity level, by private funding through school alumni.

Because the male participants, more than 30, skewed the overall number of male-to-female athletes at Marquette, and Marquette has to comply with Title IX to remain NCAA certified, it dropped wrestling.

That was an unsportsmanlike takedown, according to Brock Warder, of Sioux City, Iowa. He is a senior wrestler at Marquette University.

"Male athletics are being cheated simply because of Title IX," said Warder. "This is for my teammates who have had their career cut short. They had a tremendous amount of talent and were not given a chance, and it's sad."

With Marquette's program dead, there is just one Division I wrestling program left in the state, the University of Wisconsin, and one Division II program, the University of Wisconsin-Parkside.

The NWCA lawsuit said that such quotas have caused schools like Marquette to slash male athletic programs and were a form of reverse discrimination.

"I would like to see how this case goes through. It's a pretty impressive group of lawyers," said Jim Schmitz, who wrestled at Marquette for four years before he coached the Golden Eagles for 12.

"We did a lot of great things at Marquette. We had two NCAA qualifiers the year before our funding was cut. I'm really proud of the people we brought in and the wrestlers who graduated. It's odd that it was pushed out because of laws and rules interpretations and budget reasons."

Taking a new tack

In 1976, after a failed attempt to get Congress to support legislation that would exclude athletics from Title IX, the NCAA sued what was then the Department of Health, Education and Welfare, charging that the department should not oversee intercollegiate athletics. That case was dismissed.

However, the wrestling suit marks the first time the government is being challenged over the three-pronged compliance part of Title IX, said Larry Joseph, the lead attorney for the plaintiffs.

Joseph said the case differed from previous Title IX lawsuits because it challenged the Department of Education's rules on certain procedural grounds. The plaintiffs contend -- among numerous other items -- that because no U.S. president or attorney general signed off on the department's Title IX rules that they have no force or effect.

"The department needs to bring its policy up to date," Joseph said. "Most schools probably were discriminating in the 1970s and some schools probably still are discriminating against women today. The difference is that there are now schools treating students equally and some where it's tilted the other way, against men."

One major advocate of Title IX, the National Women's Law Center, is calling the lawsuit unoriginal and saying it is doomed to fail.

TITLE IX LAWSUIT A COMPARISON

The National Wrestling Coaches Association is suing the federal Department of Education over Title IX's proportionality issues. Marquette is one of three schools named as a party to the suit. Here's a comparison of the number of athletes competing in athletics in 1981-'82 and 1999-2000:

74,239 Combined number of female athletes at Divisions I, II and III schools in 1981-'82.

169,800 Number of male athletes.

363 Number of wrestling programs in Divisions I, II and III.

7,914 Number of wrestlers.

150,185 Combined number of female athletes at Divisions I, II and III schools in 1999-2000.

210,989 Number of male athletes.

234 Number of wrestling programs in Divisions I, II and III.

6,279 Number of wrestlers.

LOAD-DATE: January 17, 2002




Previous Document Document 52 of 67. Next Document
Terms & Conditions   Privacy   Copyright © 2004 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.