Skip banner Home   Sources   How Do I?   Site Map   What's New   Help  
Search Terms: Title IX w/10 enforcement
  FOCUS™    
Edit Search
Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed   Previous Document Document 6 of 67. Next Document

Copyright 2002 The San Diego Union-Tribune  
The San Diego Union-Tribune

November 24, 2002, Sunday

SECTION: SPORTS;Pg. C-4

LENGTH: 566 words

HEADLINE: Everyone must work together to make Title IX work

BYLINE: Nicole Vargas; STAFF WRITER

BODY:
As I sat among the county's best high school volleyball teams battling for San Diego Section championships yesterday, I could not begin to comprehend what girls and women's sports were like before Title IX.

Like many of the girls who played inside Peterson Gym, I was but a glimmer in my mother's eye when Title IX was born. I am proud to have seen and participated in the progress, but after last week's Title IX town hall debate waged in our own back yard, I wonder if the commission's report is going to solve anything.

It's no secret Title IX is an emotional issue. It's also no secret that it is difficult to understand and poorly implemented.

Instead of forming a commission to study possible changes in a law that never has been enforced correctly in the first place, how about more education for athletic directors and the public?

Of course, that won't happen any time before this commission wraps up its work.

Quick fixes for complying with Title IX were discussed at last week's meetings. Things like pulling football out of the equation or capping the ballooning incomes of football and men's basketball coaches. Neither appears realistic.

Then there is the push to prune football budgets. While $134,000 may not be much in the grand scheme of a football budget, that was the cost of the men's volleyball program before it was cut at San Diego State.

Yeah, this does sound a little like an assault on football, but that's where the money is.

Regardless of what the commission recommends, it's clear not all voices will be heard. Ten of the 15 people on the commission represent or have ties to NCAA Division I athletic programs and universities. Forget high schools, community colleges or NCAA Division II and Division III programs.

At least one commissioner, Stanford athletic director and commission co-chair Ted Leland, thinks the group can take everything it has heard in town hall meetings and prepare a report by its Jan. 31 deadline.

The report will go to Secretary of Education Rod Paige, the point man for the Bush administration, who has been clumped with the president in his staunch support of the protection from gender discrimination that is provided by Title IX.

That brings us back to the original question of why the commission was formed if it isn't there to make changes.

It all comes back to education and enforcement.

If Title IX
were gone tomorrow, women's opportunities in athletics would not take a huge step backward. We've got lawyers for that. But I would be concerned about future steps forward, and I'm not just talking sports. Fields like law and medicine are covered under Title IX.

I want the best of both worlds, to see football thrive alongside a host of Olympic sports for men and women.

If something should be done, it must be done together. All universities must band together, under the careful watch of the NCAA and federal authorities, and make this a unanimous decision to comply.

And do it.

And if the work of this commission results in no significant change, all the more reason for the Office of Civil Rights to tackle the job of enforcement.

That will guarantee the athletic futures of not only the young girls playing volleyball in Peterson Gym but the ones represented by the men's national championship banner hanging in that arena as well.

A sampling of opinion from Union-Tribune staffers.



LOAD-DATE: November 26, 2002




Previous Document Document 6 of 67. Next Document
Terms & Conditions   Privacy   Copyright © 2004 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.