Copyright 2001 St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Inc. St.
Louis Post-Dispatch (Missouri)
March 31, 2001, Saturday, FIVE STAR LIFT
EDITION
SECTION: EDITORIAL, Pg. 3
LENGTH: 566 words
HEADLINE:
DEFENDING TITLE IX
BODY:
MARCH MADNESS
MORE than
45,000 people requested tickets to tomorrow's NCAA women's basketball
championship at Savvis Center. Born into a society that no longer devalues their
talents, the players are fortunate indeed. In 1973 -- the year after Title IX
was passed -- a mere 3,000 fans straggled into Queens College to watch the final
game of a bare-bones, 16-team national championship.
Title IX is best known for giving females the opportunity to include
the lessons of athletics in education. But by amending the Education Act to
prohibit sex discrimination, Title IX did much more. It changed how America
views gender, declaring by law that women are the intellectual equals of men.
The Bush administration wants to reinterpret Title IX, a
dangerous undertaking. There is far too much to lose in turning back the clock.
Many of the mothers of today's female stars never had opportunities to compete
on teams at any level. The tragedy stretches beyond baskets never shot, to
scholarships never offered, books never read, degrees never earned.
How many female Bill Bradleys and Byron Whites never ran
for president or served on the Supreme Court, boosted by the leadership,
competitive skills and work ethic learned in team sports? How many Harvey Gantts
and J.C. Wattses never became mayor of a large city or an influential member of
Congress, using an athletic scholarship as a bridge from humble
circumstances?
The gains of Title IX are vast,
undisputed and far outweigh the costs -- the regrettable loss of a relatively
small number of men's teams at schools that were unable or unwilling to balance
sports programs in the creative manner most colleges have. Overall participation
by men in college sports has increased every year since 1996 and still accounts
for 65 percent of team rosters. But the Bush administration is considering
reinterpreting the landmark statute so that it would not adversely affect men's
teams. Yet that reinterpretation risks widening the lingering disparity between
women's and men's opportunities in college.
Ridding
schools of gender discrimination is daunting, and no method or regulation will
do a perfect job. Flaws must be weighed against Title IX's greater mission,
opening not just the world of sport, but also medicine, law and science. It has
helped curb dropout rates and wiped out archaic school rules barring teenagers
and women who are pregnant, married or mothers. One such case: In 1966 a
Georgetown University student was essentially kicked out of nursing school for
getting married. That student? Luci Baines Johnson.
Changes in Title IX enforcement would most likely
come from the new assistant secretary for civil rights within the Department of
Education. That person will be nominated by Mr. Bush and normally does not
testify in Congressional hearings. But those who wish to protect Title IX should
join the NCAA in pushing for a confirmation hearing for that candidate.
A spokesman for Sen. Jim M. Jeffords, R-Vt., chairman of
Health, Education, Labor and Pensions committee, said he would consider a
hearing if the public expressed interest. The Bush administration has not
demonstrated a light touch in scaling back other protections, from arsenic
levels in water, to carbon dioxide emissions to ergonomic injuries in the
workplace. The 45,000 folks who wanted tickets should give Mr. Jeffords a
ring.