Skip banner Home   Sources   How Do I?   Site Map   What's New   Help  
Search Terms: Title IX w/10 enforcement
  FOCUS™    
Edit Search
Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed   Previous Document Document 42 of 67. Next Document

Copyright 2002 The Tribune Co. Publishes The Tampa Tribune  
Tampa Tribune (Florida)

June 9, 2002, Sunday, FINAL EDITION

SECTION: COMMENTARY, Pg. 2

LENGTH: 543 words

HEADLINE: Let's Set The Record Straight On College Sports And Title IX

BODY:
Regular readers of The Tampa Tribune sports section will notice that all this month on page 2 there are tributes to female athletes who have left their mark on athletics locally. It is part of the celebration of the 30-year anniversary of Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972.

That year Congress decided schools must allocate equal resources to men's and women's athletics, and it has produced huge changes. The year before, 294,015 American girls participated in high school sports, compared with 3.7 million boys. Last year, nearly 3 million girls played high school sports, compared with 3.8 million boys.

But Title IX has had its detractors over the years - not because they don't believe in equality, but because they believe many men's programs have been eliminated in order to comply with its equity mandates.

The latest group is the National Wrestling Coaches Association, which filed a federal lawsuit contending that Title IX, while greatly increasing opportunities for women in school sports, is unfair to male athletes. The Bush administration contends the suit is flawed on technical legal grounds and should be dismissed.

"The administration strongly supports Title IX," said Brian Jones, the Education Department's general counsel. "Title IX has opened up opportunities for young women in both academics and sports. We believe we should strive to expand opportunities for women in a way that does not diminish existing men's teams."

That is the correct approach. Complying with Title IX should not have to hurt men to help women. Unfortunately, many colleges have interpreted the law to mean that in order to achieve equality for women, men's sports have to be trimmed. Any problems the legislation is causing can be fixed by reinterpreting the law according to its original intent and doing away with "proportional numbers" in efforts to comply.

It is understandable that wrestling coaches would say the law hurts their sport. At many schools wrestling, along with men's swimming, gymnastics and baseball, has been dropped for budgetary reasons. Title IX compliance has been cited by many athletic directors as the reason.

These same directors, however, are paying multimillion-dollar contracts to football and basketball coaches. When a school agrees to pay its football coach more than $1 million a year and then tells dozens of male wrestlers and swimmers that they cost too much, that school's priorities are out of line, and Title IX is not the reason.

Encouraging participation is the reason college sports were created in the first place. Title IX simply made sure women would be among the participants. Taking an ax to nonrevenue "Olympic" sports simply makes the law a scapegoat.

The law's intent was to provide equal opportunity for women to take part in sports, not to determine participation on the basis of numbers. And as long as only men participate in varsity football - which can have as many as 85 players on scholarship at Division I schools - there are going to be disparities in the numbers of male and female athletes - even when there are more sports offered to women.

A little common sense needs to be injected into Title IX enforcement, not just a concern about numbers.

NOTES: OUR OPINION

LOAD-DATE: June 13, 2002




Previous Document Document 42 of 67. Next Document
Terms & Conditions   Privacy   Copyright © 2004 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.