Copyright 2002 St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Inc. St.
Louis Post-Dispatch (Missouri)
September 6, 2002 Friday Five Star Lift
Edition
SECTION: NEWS ; Pg. A1
LENGTH: 819 words
HEADLINE:
SENATE GIVES GREEN LIGHT TO COCKPIT GUNS; WHITE HOUSE REVERSESSTAND,
NOW BACKS PROPOSAL
BYLINE: Ken Leiser Of The
Post-Dispatch News Services Contributed To This Report.
BODY: Nearly one year after terrorist hijackers
seized control of four airliners, the U.S. Senate approved on Thursday
legislation that could allow commercial pilots to arm
themselves.
Also, the Bush administration reversed its
earlier opposition to the proposal and signaled that it is willing to work with
Congress on a "cautious" approach to permitting guns in the cockpit.
Pilots' unions have lobbied for permission to carry guns
as part of a multilayered aviation security program that includes tougher
passenger and luggage screening, stronger cockpit doors and tighter security on
the nation's airfields.
"We realize that people are
fallible," said American Airlines first officer Al Aitken, a member of the
Allied Pilots Association committee that has been lobbying on the issue. "So the
last line of defense is that cockpit."
This summer,
the House approved a similar measure allowing properly trained pilots to carry
guns. Thursday's 87-6 Senate vote was on an amendment to a homeland security
bill. The amendment was sponsored by Sens. Barbara Boxer, D-California, and Bob Smith, R-New Hampshire. The Senate
and House willhave to work out the differences between
the bills.
"We are obviously feeling very good about
the passage of this amendment," said Air Line Pilots Association spokeswoman
Anya Piazza.
In a letter to key senators, acting
Transportation Security Administrator chief James Loy said Thursday that any
legislation would have to address numerous safety, security and cost issues.
"Many of the federal law enforcement experts we consulted
continue to have significant concerns about arming pilots. The airline industry
shares these concerns," Loy said.
Loy stressed that any
pilot permitted to carry a gun onto a plane be adequately trained, and that the
training regimen would have to be designed "from scratch" and tested.
Pilots would be issued special lockboxes to carry guns to
and from the aircraft. Cockpits would have to be outfitted with special sleeves
to store the weapons.
Making sure pilots can comply
with local, state and international gun-control laws raises many legal questions
as well, Loy added.
Overall, the cost of arming,
training and equipping all commercial pilots could reach $900 million up front
and require $250 million be spent each year after that, he said. The agency's
budget doesn't include that cost, raising questions about who will pay for
it.
"Any program open to all pilots would be very
expensive," Loy said.
Aitken, the American Airlines
pilot, said earlier studies by the FBI and others suggested a program could be
developed for one-tenth of the cost. He played down arguments citing the high
costs of the program.
Congress originally laid the
groundwork for armed pilots last fall, but left the final word with the
Transportation Security Administration and the nation's major air carriers.
Airlines have generally opposed arming pilots.
This
week, top corporate officers of the major U.S. airlines warned that putting
firearms on commercial aircraft without proper study "raises a serious and
unnecessary risk" for both passengers and flight crews.
"We believe that allowing guns aboard every aircraft in the absence of
comprehensive research and testing, and without full evaluation of the potential
consequences, is ill-advised," board members of the Air Transport Association
cautioned this week in a letter to Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta.
John Magaw, the former undersecretary for transportation
security, who was forced out this summer, originally spoke out against the idea
of arming pilots as well.
Pilots' groups were expecting
the administration of President George W. Bush to propose a scaled-back program
allowing just a tiny fraction of pilots to carry guns. But union officials said
they have seen no formal mention of it so far.
Transportation Security Administration officials would not comment
Thursday on the issue beyond Loy's letter.
Earlier
Thursday, the federal government and airline officials said they are on course
to meet a deadline of April 9 for installing stronger cockpit doors on about
7,000 aircraft.
The next generation of doors is touted
as protection against intruders, guns - even grenades - and will replace the
steel bars and locking devices that were installed on thousands of planes last
winter.
By this fall, the Federal Aviation
Administration is expected to approve designs for reinforced doors that can be
used on 90 percent of the aircraft fleet, said John Hickey, the agency's chief
of aircraft certification. Designs that would work on most aircraft have already
been approved by the FAA.
"We are prepared to be able
to meet it," said American Airlines spokesman Stephen Tankel.
American Airlines - the major airline at Lambert Field - has already
begun installing the stronger doors on some of its 1,100-aircraft fleet, Tankel
said.
NOTES: Reporter Ken Leiser:;
E-mail: kleiser@post-dispatch.com; Phone: 314-340-8119