Skip banner Home   Sources   How Do I?   Site Map   What's New   Help  
Search Terms: arm, pilots
  FOCUS™    
Edit Search
Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed   Previous Document Document 117 of 142. Next Document

Copyright 2001 The Denver Post 
All Rights Reserved  
The Denver Post

September 26, 2001 Wednesday 2D EDITION

SECTION: A SECTION; Pg. A-09

LENGTH: 594 words

HEADLINE: Arm airline pilots, union chief urges Cockpit must be defended, congressional panel told

BYLINE: By Mike Soraghan, Denver Post Washington Bureau,

BODY:
WASHINGTON - Airline pilots should be allowed to carry guns  into their cockpits to defend against armed hijackers, the head of  the airline pilots' union told Congress on Tuesday.

'Today, we are dealing with terrorist suicidal operations,'  Capt. Duane Woerth, head of the Air Line Pilots Association, told  a House subcommittee. 'The cockpit must be defended, and pilots  must play a pivotal role in protecting their place of work.'

His recommendation comes as Congress, federal officials and  the aviation industry search for ways to make airplanes less  vulnerable now that terrorists have shown that jetliners can be  easily taken over and used as guided missiles to devastating effect.

Representatives of the aviation industry also recommended  installing stun guns in cockpits and even in the cabin, building  stronger cockpit doors to keep intruders out, and limiting the  size and amount of carry-on baggage.

And in the week after airlines got a $ 15 billion bailout from  the federal government, airport executives asked for federal  dollars to pay for the increased security they've been enforcing  since flights resumed.

But the hearing showed that the aviation industry is not  united on the idea of turning over security operations at airports  to the federal government, an idea being pushed by many leaders,  including Rep. Diana DeGette, D-Colo., and Denver Mayor Wellington  Webb.

While airlines are solidly behind a 'fully federalized  seamless security system,' airport executives say the federal  government could set stronger standards and provide detailed  intelligence without taking over.

'The idea of one size fits all may not be appropriate,' said  David Plavin, president of the Airports Council International. 'We  also know what happens when we don't have adequate response.'

Currently, only law enforcement officers are allowed to carry  weapons on airplanes. Airlines can seek permission to let crew  members carry weapons, but only after getting a training program  approved by the FAA, and no airline has ever sought such approval,  said FAA spokesman Hank Price.

Under the pilot union's proposal, pilots would have to  undergo training and screening to be deputized as federal law  enforcement officers, similar to the now well-known sky marshals.  The union had previously opposed the idea of allowing guns in the  cockpit but said the new reality of terrorism has changed minds.

Woerth said that special bullets are available that would not  pierce the hull of an aircraft when fired, avoiding  depressurization in the cabin.

But that didn't mollify Rep. Ellen Tauscher, D-Calif., who  said she thinks there should be fewer weapons on airplanes, not  more.

'My opinion is that it's the pilot's job to concentrate on  flying the plane,' Tauscher said. 'I hope we can work toward a  compromise that does not increase weaponry at our airports.'

She said many of her constituents, including many pilots,  have told her they don't like the idea.

But one pilot who does like the idea says he doesn't like that  both crew and passengers are at the mercy of criminals and  terrorists.

'We have to restore confidence in our customers,' said Mike  Quaintance, who lives in Park County and flies Boeing 777s for  Continental. 'If we don't get their confidence back, we will have  a long-term problem. And arming pilots will restore confidence.'

Denver Post staff writer Karen Auge contributed to this report.

LOAD-DATE: September 27, 2001




Previous Document Document 117 of 142. Next Document
Terms & Conditions   Privacy   Copyright © 2005 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.