Skip banner Home   Sources   How Do I?   Site Map   What's New   Help  
Search Terms: "screening deadline"
  FOCUS™    
Edit Search
Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed   Previous Document Document 78 of 81. Next Document

Copyright 2001 Gannett Company, Inc.  
USA TODAY

November 30, 2001, Friday, FINAL EDITION

SECTION: NEWS; Pg. 3A

LENGTH: 549 words

HEADLINE: Baggage screening deadline looks doubtful

BYLINE: Alan Levin

DATELINE: ATLANTIC CITY

BODY:
ATLANTIC CITY -- The government faces an almost impossible task in setting up a system to examine checked bags at airports for explosives by the end of next year, industry and government officials said at an aviation security conference here.


Complying with the Dec. 31, 2002, deadline imposed by Congress would require placing thousands of explosive-detection machines in airports. This, in turn, may mean construction projects at a cost of tens of billions of dollars. It may also force travelers to endure long waits until the kinks are ironed out, experts said.


"I don't understand how it can be done" by the deadline, said Cathal Flynn, the Federal Aviation Administration's former security chief.


FAA technical expert Rodger Dickey told one seminar here that putting thousands of explosive-detection machines at airports around the country would require an effort equal to the Manhattan Project, the secret 1940s program to create an atomic bomb.


An executive at a firm that manufactures explosive-detection machines, who asked that he not be identified, called the deadline impossible.


Only a limited number of bags are checked on the 150 machines across the country. After Sept. 11, the FAA announced it would mandate screening of all checked bags by the end of 2004. The two manufacturers that had been certified to make the screening machines said that was the earliest realistic deadline.


At least 2,000 machines will be needed to cover the more than 400 airports with commercial flights.


In aviation security legislation enacted Nov. 19, Congress ordered that the deadline be moved up to next year. Some lawmakers said a hard deadline was the only way to ensure compliance.


Participants at the FAA's Aviation Security Technology Symposium this week cast doubts on Congress' goal:


* Flynn said it took about $ 300 million to rebuild London's Heathrow Airport to accommodate explosive-detection machines. That translates to about $ 3 billion to modify this country's 10 largest airports, he said. That does not include costs at the more than 400 remaining airports.


* Because such construction projects take years, airports and airlines will have to make costly temporary arrangements for the machines, possibly in parking areas or curbside, Flynn said. These will add to passenger delays, officials said.


* Though they were unwilling to say so publicly, several industry executives said the deadline cannot be met unless the government immediately begins allotting money for new machines, which cost about $ 1 million each.


* Officials at InVision Technologies and L3 Communications, the two firms certified to make the machines, are making only a handful each month. Because it will take months to ramp up production, they say no more than 1,200 machines can be produced by the end of next year, far short of the number required.


Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta, whose agency is being given control of aviation security, drew sharp criticism from Congress Tuesday when he told reporters that he doubted short-term screening methods required under the bill could be put in place by a Jan. 18 deadline. Since then, the Bush administration has said it will do everything possible to meet the deadlines.


GRAPHIC: PHOTO, B/W, Rick Bowmer, AP; Mineta: Criticized by Congress for remarks.

LOAD-DATE: November 30, 2001




Previous Document Document 78 of 81. Next Document
Terms & Conditions   Privacy   Copyright © 2005 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.